Family - The French Connection

The French Connection

In the About unit, I remarked that the Waddells are plain folk and that none of us came over with the Conqueror.

And that is true – there was no boatful of Waddells charging up the beach at Hastings shouting "Mort aux Anglais" or "Last one to slay a Saxon's a sissie". And in part, that's because the surname Waddell did not yet exist. Neither, in fact, did surnames in general.

The only form of identification (apart from the Christian name) was a territorial title or seigneury such as Duke William of Normandy, Count Eustace of Boulogne or William Malet, Seigneur of Graville. And unless you had such a distinction, your part in the battle, however valiant, would not be recorded or remembered.

And even if you did have a title or honorific, that didn't guarantee that you would be recognised by posterity. The only individuals universally agreed to have taken part are the fifteen so-called "Companions of the Conqueror".

Wikipedia, helpful as always, has this to say:

"Many ancient English families of Norman origin have claimed amongst their ancestors a participant at the Battle of Hastings as a matter of great pride …. The large majority of these claims are based on legend and cannot be proven by historical evidence.

Many hundreds of Norman nobles of varying degrees certainly fought with the Duke at Hastings, yet the fact remains that the names of only 15 of these are recorded in contemporary historical sources considered to be unimpeachable. This very select group is therefore known as the "Proven Companions …"

(1)Robert de Beaumont, 1st Earl of Leicester
(2)Eustace II, Count of Boulogne
(3)William, Count of Évreux
(4)Geoffrey of Mortagne, later Count of Perche
(5)William FitzOsbern, 1st Earl of Hereford
(6)Aimeri, Viscount of Thouars
(7)Walter Giffard, Lord of Longueville
(8)Hugh de Montfort, Lord of Montfort-sur-Risle
(9)Ralph de Tosny, Lord of Conches
(10)Hugh de Grandmesnil
(11)William de Warenne, 1st Earl of Surrey
(12)William Malet, Lord of Graville
(13)Odo, Bishop of Bayeux, later Earl of Kent
(14)Turstin FitzRolf
(15)Engenulf de Laigle

Eustace of Boulogne's part in the battle seems to have been equivocal at one juncture, when he appears to have urged William to retreat, or at least to regroup. But William of Graville evidently emerged with flying colours, and was tasked by the Conqueror (as William now was) to dispose of Harold's body in a seemly manner.

But why, it might be asked, are the two names (2) and (12) out of this illustrious fifteen singled out for especial attention?

The answer is, that, risible and absurd a pretension as it may seem, the descendants of the two individuals eventually intermarried and after a pause to get their breath back, started a steady relocation northwards to Scotland, where through an admittedly fortuitous similarity in their burgeoning surnames found common ground with the local de Wedales as newly-minted Waddells.

The idea isn't mine, and two highly-respected researchers in Waddell family history will have nothing to do with it, and yet, ever since I started to look into it, the strength of the narrative has increasingly impressed me. It's just that final quantum leap to Scotland that is uncertain.

But the connection between the Erskines and the Waddells was equally tenuous for a very long time until the credentials of Helen Halcro Wardlaw were established beyond doubt. Sometimes one must have faith that things will work out …

The originator of this scenario is in fact Caroline Wilfreda (Freda) Bingley, née Waddell, who first contacted me about it in Jan 2013. She has spent a good many decades in painstaking first-hand research in Ireland, England, Scotland and France, and has amassed a vast documentary archive.

And, not surprisingly therefore, it's taken me a while to assimilate all the historical details and family lineages involved, and present them in a format consistent with all the other Connections on this website.

Freda really hits the ground running with her thesis that the precursors to the Waddells arrived with Guillaume le Bâtard, and assembles a great deal of preliminary detail – in a very engaging and thoroughly enjoyable personal narrative – but I'm not sure that all the strands of her story are then united convincingly. The fault probably lies as much with me as it does with Freda, but let me summarise her propositions as follows – the words are mine but the context is entirely Freda's, except for links to Wikipedia inserted editorially and extracts from the internet to provide further background material to support Freda's contentions.

The Conquest

The [marshall] of the Flemish and Picard contingents in William's invasion force was one Count Eustace II of Boulogne, a step-nephew of William himself. (The County of Bologne lay further up the coast, beyond Picardy, toward Calais.)

And the [marshall] of the main Norman force was William Malet of Graville. (Graville, nowadays swallowed up by Le Havre, was very much a part of the Duchy of Normandy.)

The descendants of these two proven companions of William were eventually to unite in marriage a century and a half later, when Sir Walter III de Wahull married Heloise de Vivonia, née Malet, as outlined in the following tabulations of their family backgrounds.

The Malet lineage

It is a pleasure to acknowledge www.mallettfamilyhistory.org, the superbly organised website from which almost all the following information has been reproduced. Dates given in red are estimated.

The details of the Vivonia / Vivonne Connection are reproduced from our-royal-titled-noble-and-commoner-ancestors.com/p381.htm.

PrincipalsWives / HusbandsOffspring
Robert Malet
Seigneur de  Graville
(b 995)
 William (1020-1071)

Durand (b 1022)
William Malet
Seigneur de  Graville
(1020-1071)
Heselia Crispin de Brionne
(b 1020, m 1044)
Robert (1045-1106)

Gilbert (b 1050)

Beatrice (b 1055)
Robert
(1045-1106)
Elisee de BrionneWilliam (1070)
William
(b 1070)
UnknownNone
Gilbert Malet
(b 1050)
UnknownRobert (1090-1150/55)
Beatrice
(b 1055)
William de Arches
(b 1055, m 1080)
 
Robert Malet
(1090-1150/55)
UnknownWilliam (1120-1169/70)

Baldwin (1122-1191/97)
William Malet
Baron of Curry Malet
(1120-1169/70)
Maud Mortimer
(b 1104, m 1145)
Gilbert (1146-1193/94)
Gilbert Malet
(1146-1193/94)
Alice Picot
(b 1146)
William (1172-1219)

Ralph (b 1174)

Robert (b 1176)

Gilbert (b 1178)
William Malet
(1172-1219)
Alice Bassett
(b 1172)
Helewise (b 1198)

Mabel (b 1200)

Bertha (b 1202)
Helewise Malet
(b 1198)
Hugh Poyntz
(1198-1219, m 1215)
Unknown
Robert de Muscegros
(b 1198, m 1219)
Unknown
Mabel Malet
(b 1200)
Hugh de Vivonia
Baron Chewton
(1200-1249, m 1220)
Savary (b 1220)

William (b 1222)

Hugh (d 1257)

Heloise (b 1247)
Bertha Malet
(b 1202)
Unknown 
Savary de Vivonia
(b 1220)
Mahaut (Maud) ChabotDaughter (b 1235)
UnknownHugh (b 1245)
William de Vivonia
(b 1222)
Maud de Ferrers
(1230-1299)

d of Sir William de Ferrers, 5th Earl of Derby
Joan

Mabel

Sybil

Cecily
Hugh de VivoniaPetronilla Putot
(1210-1282,
m 9 Jan 1248)
John

Alix
Heloise de Vivonia,
née Mallet

(b 1247)
Sir Walter III de Wahull
(b 1227)
John

Beatrice

www.1066.co.nz/library/battle_abbey_roll2/subchap166.htm

The Malet family's heraldic identification with the buckle (fermail) has been explained with reference to the diminutive form (fermaillet) – not a particularly impressive pun by modern standards perhaps, but sufficient in those days to give them proprietary rights on their famous triple-buckle armorial ID.

Freda: "Every family in Europe that I come across using heraldic buckles go back to one family – that of William Malet, the commander of the Norman soldiers at the Battle of Hastings"

OrnaVerum: "It has suddenly dawned on me that the really significant, game-changing, charges on a coat of arms are not the ordinaries (ie the chiefs, fesses, saltires etc) but the subordinaries (the buckles, suns, crescents, scallops etc) – it is the latter in particular that identify two apparently distinct coats of arms as having a familial connection.

The critical importance (for the nascent Waddell family name in the Scottish Border area of Wedale) of the matrimonial and heraldic union of Heloise de Vivonia with Sir Walter III de Wahull in the early/mid 1260's, is that she acted as a conduit for the Malet buckles into his coat or arms, displacing the Seton crescents, and pointing the way ahead to the 'Waddell' arms as displayed in the Heraldic Footprint section."

The Lens lineage

Most of these details are reproduced (after cross-checking) from Wikipedia.

The rather counter-intuitive intricacies of Seier and Walter de Lens' family fortunes are reproduced from www2.thesetonfamily.com:8080/directory/seier_de_seton(1).htm.

Principals & ArmsWives / HusbandsOffspring
Eustace I
Count of Boulogne
(b 995-1049)

[Red with 3 gold suns]
Maud (Matilda) de Louvain / Leuven
(b 1006)

daughter of Lambert I of Leuven

direct descendant of Charlemagne
Eustace II (1020-1087)

Godfrey, Bishop of Paris

Lambert II, Count of Lens (1022-1054)

Gerberga
Eustace II (1020-1087)

[as per Eustace I, but suitably differenced]
Goda (d 1047)

daughter of King Aethelred the Unready, [and his second wife Emma, sister of Richard II "The Good" Duke of Normandy]

sister of King Edward the Confessor and Ælfred Ætheling

previously married to Drogo of Mantes

and mother of Ralph / Rudolph of Mantes

Walter of Mantes
and Fulk.
No issue
Ida of Lorraine
(1040-1113)
(m 1057)
Eustace III (rejected the crown of Jerusalem)

Godfrey of Bouillon
1st King of Jerusalem

Baldwin I of Jerusalem
2nd King of Jerusalem
Lambert II,
(1022-1054),
Count of Lens

[Red with one gold crescent]
 Seier* de Lens

Walter de Lens
Adelaide of Normandy,
Countess of Aumale,
(m 1053),

daughter of Robert I, "The Magnificent", Duke of Normandy, and Arlette Herleva de Falaise,

sister of William I,
"The Conqueror",
Duke of Normandy,

First husband
Enguerrand II, Count of Ponthieu,

Third husband
Odo, Count of Champagne

after which she lost Count …
Judith of Lens
(1054-1086)
Seier de Lens

(by then styled Seier de Seton, aka Dougall = Dark Stranger)
 Walter the Fleming (of both Seton and Wahull/Odell – see following tables)

Hugh (took the so-called Boulonnais legacy, with descendants Baldwin, Eustace & Godfrey de Lens)
Walter de Lens

(by then styled Vieux Gautier = Old Walter)
 Winemar of Lens

aka Winemar the Fleming
Judith of Lens
(1054-1086)

Niece of William the Conqueror,

Step-sister of Seier de Seton and Walter de Lens
Waltheof (1050-1076),
Earl of Northumbria and Huntingdon
(m 1070)
Maud (1074-1131)
Countess of Huntingdon

Adelise

Uchtred
Maud, Countess of Huntingdon
(1074-1131)

Great-niece of William the Conqueror,

Step-niece of Seier de Seton and Walter de Lens
Simon de Senlis
(m 1090)
Matilda (d 1140)

Simon (d 1153)

Waltheof (d 1160)
King David I of Scotland
(m 1113)
Malcolm

Henry

Claricia

Hodierna
Seiher and his Scottish descendants The Setons
[crescent(s)]
Walter the Fleming
baron of Seton & Wahull/Odell

[Gold with three red crescents]
Following the Conquest, Walter the Fleming also became Baron of Odell, and was succeeded there by his son Walter de Wahull …The Barons de Wahull in Bedfordshire …

The Barony became extinct in 1635
Walter III de Wahull
(b 1227)
Heloise,

daughter of Hugh de Vyvonne & Mabel Malet
(see preceding table)

* Interestingly, this was probably not his actual forename, as 'Seier' is Scots vulgo of French 'Seigneur' (ie the Seigneur of Seton).

On the other hand, at least one of his Wahull descendants was baptised as Saher, so Seier may well have been an early example of rank as praenomen (given or adopted) – we nowadays happily refer to American Big Band jazz artistes Ellington, Basie and Hines as Duke, Count and Earl respectively!

But more importantly, what was the territorial significance of Seton? Seier's father Eustace, brother Walter and he himself had all been granted English estates following the Conquest, as subsequently registered in the Domesday Book of 1086. But (to cut a long story short) the Seton estate was actually in Scotland and was granted by King Malcolm III of Scotland (father of King David I of Scotland) to Seier after the latter had fled northwards in the late 1060's after a military misadventure had brought him into serious disfavour with William I of England.

As far as I know, Seier hunkered down in Seton permanently, leaving his eldest son Walter the Fleming to take care of the Odell estate in Bedfordshire.

From this table we see that Seton (in modern East Lothian) and Odell (in modern Bedfordshire) were two poles of the same familial axis. To quote the reference, there can be no doubt at all that [Walter the Fleming's] personal heraldic emblem, the triple crescents gules and a field or, of a second son of the Count of Boulogne, flew over both [Seton Palace and Odell Castle].

The 'Odell' lineage

These details are reproduced from www.bedfordshire.gov.uk/ CommunityAndLiving/ ArchivesAndRecordOffice/ CommunityArchives/ Odell/ TheBaronyOfOdell.aspx.

The Odell Barony: Summary

  • Walter the Fleming;
  • Walter de Wahull, son of Walter the Fleming;
  • Simon de Wahull, son of Walter - flourished around the middle of the 12th century;
  • Walter de Wahull son of Simon, Baron by 1160 and until at least 1172;
  • Simon de Wahull, son of Walter - died before 1197;
  • John de Wahull, son of Simon - a minor until at least 1206; died about 1217;
  • Rose, wife of Robert Lisle and Agnes, wife of Robert Basingham (later William Fitz Warine), sisters of John; Rose died in 1222 without issue, leaving Agnes Baroness in her own right, she died in 1238;
  • John de Basingham, son of Agnes - died 1239;
  • Saher de Wahull, son of Walter and brother of the Simon who died before 1197 - he died in 1250;
  • Walter de Wahull, son of Saher - born 1227, died before 1269;
  • John de Wahull, son of Walter - died 1296;
  • Thomas de Wahull, son of John - died 1303;
  • John de Wahull, son of Thomas - born 1302, died 1336;
  • John de Wahull, son of John - born about 1320, died 1348;
  • John de Wahull, son of John - a minor on succeeding to the title, died 1367;
  • Elizabeth and Eleanor de Wahull, daughters of John - born 1364 and 1365 respectively, both died 1376;
  • Nicholas de Wahull, son of the John who died in 1348 - he died in 1410;
  • Thomas de Wahull, son of Nicholas - born about 1387, died in 1421;
  • Thomas de Wahull, son of Thomas - died in 1441;
  • John de Wahull, son of Thomas - born 1436, died in 1490;
  • Fulk de Wahull, son of John - died in 1511;
  • Nicholas de Wahull, son of Fulk - died in 1531;
  • Anthony de Wahull, son of Nicholas - died in 1542;
  • Agnes de Wahull - born seventeen days before her father's death; she married Richard Chetwood who died in 1560 and then Sir George Calvely; Agnes died in 1576;
  • Richard Chetwood, son of Agnes de Wahull and Richard Chetwode - a minor on succeeding his mother, he alienated his Bedfordshire property to the Alston family in 1633 and died in 1635.

Freda: "Any English family with 3 crescents forming part of their armorial tat I have researched go back to a marriage to a de Wahull – later this became Wodhull"

The 'Wahull' Story

These details are reproduced from 'Parishes: Odell', A History of the County of Bedford: Volume 3 (1912), pp. 69-76. www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=42385.

The Wahull barony: History

The descent of the barony of Wahull is as follows: Walter the Fleming, the Domesday holder, was followed by his son Walter, (fn. 34) whose son Simon flourished in the reign of Stephen (1135–54), and who together with his wife Sibyl and his eldest son Walter is found presenting Langford Church to the Knights Templars. (fn. 35)

The barony passed to Walter, who held it in 1160. (fn. 36) He was a man typical of the turbulent time in which he lived. With Robert Foliot and others he was described by Theobald Archbishop of Canterbury (1139–61) as 'invader' of Ramsey Abbey, and was commanded to desist from his depredations. (fn. 37) Again, in 1172, on the occasion of a quarrel between Henry II and his son Prince Henry, which almost assumed the proportions of a civil war, Walter appears to have taken an active part on the prince's side, and in company with others was taken prisoner in Norfolk. (fn. 38) Walter left two sons, Simon the elder and Saher, of whom later. Simon died shortly before 1197, in which year Hubert Archbishop of Canterbury paid £333 6s. 8d. for the wardship and marriage of his son and heir John de Wahull. (fn. 39) John was still a minor on the death of Hubert in 1206, and the wardship was transferred on a further payment of 300 marks to Isabel widow of Geoffrey de Mandeville Earl of Essex and wife of Hubert de Burgh, Justiciar of England. (fn. 40) In 1213 John de Wahull furnished three well-equipped knights for one year's service beyond the sea, receiving for himself at the same time permission to delay his own departure thither on account of his ill-health. (fn. 41) He died c. 1217, leaving two sisters and co-heirs, Rose wife of Robert Lisle, and Agnes, at this time wife of Robert Basingham, on whose death in the same year she married William FitzWarine. (fn. 42) They obtained full seisin of their brother's barony on payment of a relief of £200. (fn. 43) Rose de Wahull died in 1222 without issue, (fn. 44) and Agnes thus acquired entire right in the Wahull barony. John de Basingham, her son by her first husband, succeeded his mother in 1238, (fn. 45) and died the following year without direct heirs. (fn. 46) The barony now reverted to Saher de Wahull, son of Simon de Wahull, and great-uncle of John de Basingham. (fn. 47) He paid baronial relief on succession to the lands of his ancestors, (fn. 48) and personally performed baronial service with the king beyond the seas in 1242. (fn. 49) He died in 1250 seised of the Wahull honour, when his son Walter, aged twenty-three, succeeded him (fn. 50) and paid the ordinary £100 relief of a baron in the same year. (fn. 51) In 1257 he received simple protection on the occasion of a journey to Santiago, (fn. 52) probably as a pilgrim to visit the world-famous shrine of St. James of Compostella. (fn. 53) He was summoned by special writ (one of the privileges attached to the rank of majores barones in the Great Charter of 1215) for military purposes in 1260, 1261 and 1263. (fn. 54) Walter de Wahull, who died ante 1269, married Heloise daughter of Hugh de Vivonia. His son John de Wahull received nine writs as a baron between the years 1276 and 1295.These were not summonses to Parliament, but undoubtedly military writs. (fn. 55) The only possible exception is a writ dated from Rhuddlan, 28 June 1283, summoning him to Shrewsbury on 30 September. The writ runs, 'to ordain what should be done with the aforesaid David (fn. 56) … to speak with us upon this and other matters.' This has been held to imply that John de Wahull was subsequently present at the Parliament held at Acton Burnell, near Shrewsbury,in the same year, when David was condemned to behanged, drawn and quartered, and when the statute de Mercatoribus was passed. (fn. 57)

John de Wahull married Agnes daughter of Sir Henry Pinkney of Weedon Pinkney, by whom he had a son Thomas, (fn. 58) who had succeeded his father in 1296. (fn. 59) Thomas de Wahull received three writs of summons, two in 1297 and 1298 of a military character, and one in 1296–7 endorsed 'de Parliamento tenendo apud Sarum.' (fn. 60) Apart from the fact that no proof exists of Thomas' presence at Salisbury, this meeting is not technically recognized as a Parliament. (fn. 61)

Thomas de Wahull died in 1303, when his son John was one year old. (fn. 62) During his long minority the king retained his guardianship, (fn. 63) and in 1323, on receiving his homage, gave him full seisin of his father's lands. (fn. 64) In 1330, on the occasion of the special commission of inquiry into privileges known as the Placita de Quo Warranto, John de Wahull was exempt from amerciaments by the justices in eyre at the Bedford Assizes as a baron, (fn. 65) that is one who in virtue of his rank must be amerced by his equals or before the Royal Council. (fn. 66) He was summoned to attend the king by writ witnessed at Roxburgh in1334, (fn. 67) and died in 1336, (fn. 68) leaving a son and heir John de Wahull, a minor of sixteen years of age and more. (fn. 69) He was summoned by special writ in 1347, and died in the following year, (fn. 70) his son John being under age, as had been the case in the two previous successions. (fn. 71) John de Wahull died in 1367 without male issue, when his two daughters, Elizabeth aged three and Eleanor aged two, became his co-heirs. (fn. 72) They both died in 1376 before attaining thei rmajority, and the barony reverted to their great-uncle Nicholas son of John de Wahull. (fn. 73) Nicholas de Wahullis described as holding the barony of Wahull in 1404, (fn. 74) and died in 1410, when his son Thomas, aged twenty three years and more, succeeded him. (fn. 75) He paid full baronial relief to the king in 1412–13, (fn. 76) and died in1421, leaving one son Thomas by his marriage with Elizabeth sister and heir of Sir Thomas Cheetwood. (fn. 77) Thomas, who was under age in 1421, and who is styled Baron of Wahull in Letters Patent, (fn. 78) married Isabel daughter of Sir William Trussell, and had one son John, who at the time of his father's death in 1441 was five years of age. (fn. 79) John de Wahull died in 1490, and his lands and dignity passed to his son Fulk, (fn. 80) who by his marriage with Ann daughter and co-heir of William Newenham had three sons, of whom the eldest, Nicholas, succeeded his father in 1511. (fn. 81)

He married Elizabeth daughter and co-heir of Sir William Parr, by whom he had a son Anthony, who followed him in 1531. (fn. 82) On Anthony's death in 1542 his daughter and heir Agnes was only seventeen days old. (fn. 83) She married twice. Her first husband was Richard Chetwood, and in 1558–9 a statute passed for restoring to the Crown its ancient ecclesiastical and spiritual jurisdiction has a special proviso, by which Richard and Agnes Chetwood? whose marriage had been declared invalid by Cardinal Pole, and who had appealed to Rome for reversion of his sentence? were to be allowed to abide by the decision of the Papal Court, 'any Lawe, Costume, Usage, Canon . . . . to the contrary nothwithestanding.' (fn. 84) Richard Chetwood died a year later, and Agnes subsequently married Sir George Calvely. She died in 1575–6, when her heir was her only son Richard Chetwood, a minor. (fn. 85) He became a member of the Inner Temple, and about the year 1613 presented a petition to James I claiming the ancient barony in fee of Wahull, as being heir lineal and sole of his several ancestors who had been summoned to attend, and had attended the king as barons. (fn. 86) This petition was referred to the commissioners for exercising the office of Earl Marshal, at that time void. They returned a report in which they stated that they held his petition to be true, and that they considered him to be worthy of the dignity of a baron. (fn. 87) According to family tradition, after the report was made, Sir Richard Chetwood was offered a peerage of new creation, which he refused. (fn. 88) In 1632 Sir Richard Chetwood alienated his Bedfordshire property to the Alstons, (fn. 89) and died three years later. A little over 100 years later, in 1739, Knightley Chetwood, direct heir and great-great-grandson of Richard Chetwood, presented a petition to George III claiming the title of Baron de Wahull, and relying on the favourable report of the commissioners in the reign of James I; the petition was referred to the Attorney General, but no further action in the matter taken. (fn. 90) His grandson Jonathan Chetwood in 1831 presented a similar petition to William IV, which was referred to Sir Thomas Denman, then Attorney-General. He, considering the descent from Saher de Wahull satisfactorily proved and other arguments brought forward worthy of consideration, advised that the case should be referred to the House of Peers. In 1833 therefore it was referred to the Committee for Privileges. (fn. 91) Jonathan Chetwood had no issue? save one son Valentine, who died in infancy? and died in 1839 without further prosecuting his claim. A further claim was made to this barony in 1890, when Constantia Elizabeth Chetwood-Aiken, great-great-granddaughter of Knightley Chetwood, the claimant of 1739, presented her petition to Queen Victoria. (fn. 92) It was referred to the House of Lords for adjudication, but she died in 1892 without her claims having come before the Committee for Privileges, and her son John Chetwood Chetwood-Aiken preferred her claim. The case was brought before the Committee for Privileges in 1892, the petitioner basing his claim on direct descent from the de Wahulls, (fn. 93) who it was claimed were 'Barones Majores,' documentary proof of their possession of the rights which belong to such rank being brought forward. (fn. 94) The claim, however, broke down on the ground that though special writs of summons had been issued at various times to the de Wahulls they were either definitely for military service, or when not definitely so stated to be they were very doubtful. And that since the right to being a peer, as laid down by Coke and repeated decisions of the House of Lords, consists in summons to Parliament by writ, and sitting in Parliament in pursuance of that summons, the Committee of Privileges decided that the petitioner John Chetwood Chetwood-Aiken had failed to prove that such a peerage was ever created. (fn. 95)

From: 'Parishes: Odell', A History of the County of Bedford: Volume 3 (1912), pp. 69-76. URL: www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=42385 Date accessed: 10 May 2013.

Freda: "It is hard to pinpoint who it was in the de Wahull family who went to Scotland … it could have been a descendant of John de Wahull who married de Pinquinay. Firstly he could not use crescents even with a variation as by then they may not have known of the relationship with the Setons. However he could use [Arms] based on heiresses in his family … Mabel Malet and Heloise de Vivonne."

The diffusion of the Odell / de Wahull descendants southwards to (eg) Kent and northwards to Scotland is evidenced by the following tabulation of Freda's personal observations.

RegionCognates
ScotlandWaddell, Weddell
N of EnglandWaddle, Woodall
MidlandsWoodall, Udall
BedfordshireOdell, Wodhull; Wahull
KentWaddell

The full effect of such an osmotic drift northwards, though doubtless genuine enough, could only have been accomplished over many generations, and I would like more emphasis to be placed on the powerful Flandrophilic effect of Seton Palace and its surrounding enclave of the Seton family, upon the Wahulls of Bedfordshire. The Setons and Wahulls were close kin genetically and heraldically, and doubtless there must have been many a purposeful journey northwards to seek the new opportunities of patronage afforded by the marriage of Seier's step-niece Maud to King David I of Scotland in 1113, and also by the King's policy of encouraging an influx of Norman (later Angevin) barons from England to help keep control, especially of Galloway in the Southwest. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castles_in_Great_Britain_and_Ireland.

Click here to see the historic location of Seton Palace (modern postcode EH32 0PG) on Streetmap, and here to see the modern location of the village Stow in (of) Wedale.

If you were riding northwards to Seton Palace from Bedfordshire in the twelfth or thirteenth centuries, you would be more than likely to chance upon the little village of Stow, in the Wedale valley of modern Midlothian. And if you overnighted there, got to meet the locals, some of whom (by the thirteenth century anyway) bore a toponym surprisingly similar to your own, and happened to notice how nice their maidenfolk were, you might well decide that you could travel further and fare worse.

But, even more importantly, if you were hoping to be recruited by King David I, Stow was roughly equidistant from his southern seat at Roxburgh Castle, then located a few miles southwest of Kelso, as it was from Seton Palace. In other words Stow of Wedale occupied an optimal position for Wahull / Wadhull newcomers from Odell.

In the box above, the idea has been infiltrated that the multiplication of the de Wedale surname, from which the modern Waddell surname then developed, was a two-tier process: organic growth from the original inhabitants of the area allied to a steady influx of outsiders with a very similar-sounding name, and an eventual conflation of the two.

And the smoking gun as to just who those outsiders were is provided by the Maletian buckles in the coat of arms eventually granted to the family (and I still don't know when). I sincerely hope that this exposition has done justice to these ideas so enthusiastically and eloquently propounded by Freda Bingley.

The evidence for and against this, and other, suggestions as to the origins and development of the de Wedale surname are admirably analysed by Gavin Main Waddell in the first chapter 'Origins of the Name' of his forthcoming treatise A History Of The Waddells Of Scotland.

Stow of Wedale

Whatever may be the final consensus as to the origins of the surname Waddell, it seems likely that agreement has been reached as to the origins of the toponym Stow of Wedale, more commonly known just as Wedale.

As explained in the extracts reproduced below,

  • Stow = Holy place – as per Stow on the Wold in Gloucestershire
  • We (Wiche) = Shrine – to the Virgin Mary (aka Our Lady or St Mary)
  • Dale = valley – in fact the valley of the River Gala which runs past the village
www.stow-borders.co.uk/about-stow/

Stow & Fountainhall

The local authority Parish of Stow stretches from Crookston (near Heriot) to Bowland, and has two main centres of population: Stow and Fountainhall.

Stow, or more properly, Stow of Wedale is a small village nestling in a bend of the Galawater valley in the Scottish Borders. Various explanations have been given for the name of the village; until recently it was accepted that Stow came from the Anglo-Saxon for a stockaded place and Wedale described the country of the Goidel – an old British tribe who lived in a wide expanse from Wales to the river Tay. But it is more likely that the name means The Holy Place in the Valley of the Shrine (wiche meaning "shrine" and dale meaning "valley"; wiche dale = "wedale"). This definition takes us back to St Mary's Well which stands just to the south of the village.

Fountainhall – with a population of 280, Fountainhall is a small community with its own school and village hall. It supports a thriving WRI and is strongly linked to the farming community. Lying just a couple of miles to the north of Stow, Fountainhall comes together with Stow as one community enjoying many social and economic links with Heriot and Galashiels.

The previously popular derivation of 'We' was from the Latin word Vae = woe, as in the phrase Vae victis = Woe to the conquered. In this case, the woe was supposedly felt by the Saxons who suffered a crushing defeat in the Gala Valley by the forces of the semi-legendary King Arthur.

Another, slightly less plausible and deservedly less popular, derivation of the name Wedale as a whole, was from the pre-Gaelic Celtic tribe of Goidel, via a mythology worthy of Laurence Austine Waddell himself!

Remains of the Bishop's House (aka mansion or summer palace)

William Lamberton (Bishop of St Andrews 1298-1328) had a number of such mansions built at important locations around his diocese, to accommodate himself and his episcopal retinue during his pastoral travels in the summer months.

www.arc-architects.com/downloads/Monimail-Tower-Paper-2002.pdf

... While extremely concerned with the good repair of the monastery buildings and making much available [for that], he {Lamberton} repaired little on his own estates. After he had served as bishop for some eighteen years, when shown by members of his household to be guilty of not building his own manor-houses, he is said to have once replied in some agitation: 'With the help of the grace of God, I intend to erect buildings of such size and of such strength that many as my successors, will think it important to maintain them in a suitable or similar condition.' From then on he completed [one of his manor houses] nearly every year at quite considerable expense, namely his own fortress palace at St. Andrews, his manor-houses at Inchmurdo, Monimail, Dairsie, Torry, Muchart, Kettins, Monymusk, Liston, Lasswade and Stow in Wedale ...

The old Kirk

www.scotlandschurchestrust.org.uk/church/st-mary-of-wedale-stow

Church Overview

An impressive example of late 19th century Gothic Revivial architecture, 1876, by Wardrop and Reid; the 140ft spire is a local landmark. The church is T-plan with, unusually for a reformed church, an apse. The exterior has lots of Gothic detailing; the inside is enhanced by stained glass by James Ballantine & Son. The church dominates the valley of the Gala Water, the former name of which was Wedale. The ruins of an earlier medieval church stand slightly to the north and, outside the village, are the remains of St Mary's well and a chapel which is said to date back to the time of King Arthur.

The birthplace of the surname of Waddell?



This beautiful picture, taken by M J Richardson, looks southwards down the Gala Water towards the church of St Mary in the village of Stow of Wedale.

The celebrated pack-horse bridge is clearly visible in the mid-right of the picture ...

... or see below for an upstream image of it in a wintry setting (from Wikipedia),

or slightly downstream in a summery setting (thanks to Michael Oglethorpe).

There are a number of interesting websites dedicated to Stow of Wedale, most of which overlap to some extent. Please see the following example.

www.jamespringle.co.uk/html/stow_of_wedale_.html

Stow of Wedale

The village of Stow has a long and notable history, which is closely linked to the traditions of the church, going back to mediaeval times. In old English, the word "Stow" means a holy or consecrated place. When the Scots conquered Lothian in 1018, the Ancient church of St Mary of Wedale passed into the diocese of St Andrews (and hence into Midlothian). Throughout the Middle Ages, it was famous for being one of only three sanctuaries in Scotland where persons could find refuge in times of trial.

Stow was known then as "Stow in Wedale", and the name of Wedale described what is known today as the Gala Water. Various explanations have been given for the background to the name "Wedale" including "Valley of Woe" and the dale of the holy house to an abbreviation for the Celtic Goidel race, but it is now known that Wedale derives from 'Wiche' meaning shrine and 'Dahl' meaning valley. So Stow in Wedale means 'holy place in the valley of the shrine'. The first written mention of Wedale comes in the Historia Britonum" written by the Welsh monk Nemius in AD 826. According to Nemius, King Arthur had, in gratitude to Our Lady for a vision in which she assured him of victory over the invading Angles, caused an image of Our Lady to be brought from Cappadocia and placed in "Our Lady's House at Wedale".

In 1242, a new church, also dedicated to St Mary, was built at the edge of the village and beside the Bishop of St Andrews' palace. This was both a place of sanctuary and pilgrimage. The extension of the Bishop of St Andrews' lands to include Stow was probably the reason why the land from the watershed at Fala to Bowland was formerly part of the county of Midlothian; as this was border country with its back to the Lothians, such an arrangement could be seen as an anomaly, which was changed in 1972, when the lands became part of Selkirkshire.

In the 15th century, a new church was built to the west of the Bishop's Palace using red ashlar. This was rebuilt in the 17th century, and boasted an outside stair giving access by a doorway dated 1660 to galleries on the north, east and west sides.

The date of 1771 can still be seen on the windows of the remains of this building, which served as church until 1876, but has been disused since that time.

'Place-Names of Scotland' by James Johnston, 1892.

Wedale: ca 1160. Old English: wa-dael (in Danish: vee-dal), 'vale of woe,' so called by Angles from their great defeat there by King Arthur.

Odell

Let's look a bit more deeply at what is known about the village of Odell itself – firstly from the modern perspective. We can see an amazing close approximation to the modern surname Waddell, and a completely new derivation of it!

Extracts reproduced from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odell,_Bedfordshire

History

Roman and Saxon period

Evidence of occupation includes the remains of a farm dating from just before the Roman invasion. It comprised two round timber buildings inside a fenced enclosure, and two cremation pits. After the conquest its survival and prosperity may have been linked to there being a Roman presence at Irchester.

The evidence is that the farm was abandoned in the 4th century and remained unoccupied until the 6th or 7th century. After this it no doubt experienced a chequered history owing to attacks by Danish Vikings.

In the early 11th century the area where the present village lies was part of five or more hides that were under Levenot, a thane of King Edward the Confessor, who owned much land.

At that time the village was already known by the name of Wadelle, or Wadehelle. This name means "the hill where woad grows". Woad (Isatis tinctoria) was important as a source of indigo blue textile dye.

Wahul history 1066–1633

After the battle of Hastings in 1066, William the Conqueror and his Normans progressively took control of the whole of England. In many cases regions were given to fellow soldiers to manage. The lands owned by Levenot, along with the title of baron, were passed to a Walter Flandrensis, the Count of Flanders, who is thought to have fought alongside William.

Walter is mentioned as early as 1068, and sometimes as Walter de Wahul (Wahul being a variant of Wadehelle). His arrival marked the start of a period of centuries during which a family bearing an Odell-type name continued to hold most of these lands.

Odell was recorded in the Domesday book of 1086 as a parish of the Hundred of Willey.

Amongst the de Wahul dynasty were a number of interesting characters. The wild Simon de Wahul was described by the Archbishop of Canterbury as an "invader" of Ramsey Abbey. It is also known that Simon sided with Prince Henry in 1172 when Henry rebelled against his father. On the other hand, Simon's own son, another Simon, was very devout. He ended up dying in 1191 on a crusade.

In 1542, in the absence of a male heir, the estate came to 17-day-old Agnes Woodhall (like Wodelle this is another variant of the name). She married twice and her son by Richard Chetwood, also called Richard, became the heir to the estate on her death in 1575.

About this time the village often becomes referred to as Odell.

In 1613 Richard made efforts to be recognised as Baron of Odell (a claim his 18th-century great-great-grandson and 19th-century descendant also later pursued) but without success. In 1633, Richard sold the estate to William Alston and, after five hundred years, Odell village was no longer under the influence of a descendant of the family bearing the same name.

Pronunciation

Most people pronounce the village's name as "oh-DEL", like the surname. Some commentators, however, consider it should be pronounced "OH-dl", rhyming with Yodel.

And then from the Domesday records:

Extracts reproduced from bedsarchives.bedford.gov.uk/CommunityArchives/Odell/OdellIn1086.aspx

.....

The Domesday Book recorded two manors in Odell. One was held by an Arnulf of Ardres (a town near Calais). He had four and a half hidesA and a third of a virgateB and held the manor from Count Eustace II of Boulogne. The manor comprised three villagers, seven smallholders and two slaves. Each of these people would probably have had a family, giving a possible total of around fifty people. Before 1066 Alfwold, a thegnC of King Edward the Confessor (1042-1066) had held the manor and it had then been worth £8. This had declined to £5 by the time Alfwold was deprived of it by the new Norman King and by 1086 the value had sunk still further to £3. This holding, later identified with Little Odell Manor may well have been in the west of the modern parish around Little Odell.

.....

The larger, more important manor, of five hides, one virgate and parts of a further virgate was held by Walter of Flanders directly from King William I. He had the manor after William deprived its Anglo-Saxon thegn, Leofnoth. The manor contained thirteen villagers, five smallholders and five slaves - perhaps around ninety people all told, meaning that Odell probably held just shy of a hundred and fifty people - three times the size of Harrold at that date! This manor also contained a mill on the River Great Ouse worth two hundred eels and woodland for sixty pigs. In Leofnoth's days it had been worth £10, this had fallen to £8 by the time Walter was given it and it was only worth £5 by 1086.

Footnotes:

A A hide was (sometimes and somewheres) taken to be (about) 120 acres.
B A virgate was (sometimes and somewheres) taken to be (about) 30 acres.
C A thegn (or thane) was the Saxon equivalent of a Baron.

The following extract relates to the smaller manor, held by Arnulf of Ardres from tenant-in-chief Count Eustace of Boulogne, who in turn held it from the monarch.

opendomesday.org/book/bedfordshire/05/

Wadelle is the sixth entry in the section Terra [Comitis?] Eustac[e]

And the next to the larger manor, held by tenant-in-chief Walter of Flanders from the monarch:

opendomesday.org/media/images/bdf/14.png

Currently unavailable (27 Jan 2017)

We have be careful though – is this Walter of Flanders the same as Walter the Fleming, of Wahull and Seton? I think he was, as his great-uncle Eustace II (veteran of Senlac) had died in about 1087, his grandfather Lambert II of Lens had died in 1054, his uncle Walter (vieux Gautier) was back in Normandy, his father Seier de Lens was lurking up in Scotland during a period of royal disfavour, his brother Hugh was busy with other things, so who else was there?

"So let us never, never doubt what nobody is sure about."

One literary B of 6 letters reminding me of another such, both with a claustric connection, one hears, it's time for another cutting from the "garden of bright images" that flourishes on the internet,